I personally agree that women need to be able to choose when they get pregnant for a slew of sound reasons. That done we now come to the real problem and that is that ending a pregnancy is no more acceptable than infanticide and should only be accepted in order to prevent a medically failed infant or the demise of the mother and event that during the early part of the pregnancy since care for premature infants is now excellent and viable.
What has to happen though is that all economic aspects need to be removed. What we have is a patchwork quilt that is borderline barbaric. I think that when a women becomes pregnant she becomes a mother and demands the full support of society until the infant is at least weaned and likely a full year old. Do that and also provide ongoing support and most problems will go away. We should see fully restored birthrates as well.
The last issue is even more controversial. All newborns need to be DNA sampled and indexed with confirmation of both parents. The father is then deemed responsible for the life of his child and he cannot escape this responsibility. This will be modified to conform with common law, but it needs to be also cast in stone. This puts a high price on reckless behavior for both men and women which has been allowed to work in the grey area of law and responsibility.
Ending all that will drive a resurgence of both male and female responsibility as both find it mostly inescapable. I think we can agree such a resurgence will be socially beneficial..
Attacks on Planned Parenthood Are Devastating Women's Choice, New Study Confirms